John White Pole Shift Pdf Viewer
Pole Shift 2019
I notice that Armageddon Online does not list, under 'Causality by Natural',
a 'Pole Shift' entry. Without dilly-dallying around, I'll say that a 'pole shift'
is the scenario I find most likely. Please, don't jump my case about certain
individuals whom have ascribed to such a scenario. For example, Immanuel
Velikovsky, Charles Hapgood, or John White. Many people with solid math
and science backgrounds who have proposed such a scenario, both in our
planet's past and future. Intuitively, one explanation of how a pole shift is
possible makes sense to me. Consider a celestial body with a very strong
magnetic field, several times stronger than Jupiter's. If such a body were
to pass through this solar system, depending on its positioning it might be
highly influential on Earth. The interaction, between the foreign magnetic
field and Earth's, could produce internal stress within our planet's core..
which can result in things like strong vulcanism and tectonic movement.
If the body were to pass closely enough, it's theorized that Earth could
temporarily 'realign' to the orientation of said body. One mechanism for
this behavior could be a slowing of the core's rotation, due to resistance
provided by this foreign magnetic field. If the core were spinning slowly
enough, it is possible that the north and south poles would be internally
affected, resulting in a partial axial rotation. This would be accompanied
by a shifting of the lithosphere, as the core and mantle moved under it.
Punctuated equilibrium, in the context of planetary evolution, would say
that long periods of 'continental drift' can be interrupted by short, quick
periods of 'continental shift'. Such a shifting of the tectonic plates may
produce several 'side effects', such as extreme vulcanism, earthquakes,
oceanic 'surges', and sudden global climate changes. Now, all that said,
such a thing could be 'predictable', if enough knowledge is available on
the foreign celestial body. Such a thing is, of course, theorized to have
happened in past millenia. The myths of a 'great flood' are present in a
great many cultures around the world. These myths aren't solely about
flooding - other events happened as well. It is statistically possible that
these seemingly mutually exclusive stories are, in fact, a simultaneously
experienced event. It isn't out of the realm of possibility that the myths
are based not upon overactive imaginations, but a normally active solar
system. Mankind seems to think that the solar system is quite static..
but then again, our current civilization has been learning for such a tiny
amount of time, galactically speaking. In closing, I must address these
issues from a 'prophetic' standpoint. People have long spoke of events
to come, which would be catastrophic but survivable. Their words can't
be solely depended upon, but they can be interleaved with a knowledge
base involving math, science, mythology, and eschatology. For example,
Nostradamus, Mother Shipton, Edgar Cayce, and Robert Ghost Wolf, are
not simply people to listen to once and then ignore. What they say can
be valuable information when considered with all other knowledge about
the potentiality of a global catastrophe. This subject, of 'armageddon',
is immensely deep, and heavily interdisciplinary. Most people would not
prefer to discuss it frankly and without prejudice toward discounting it.
I happen to find the topic not only fascinating, but pertinent to current
events and potential future events - maybe in our lifetimes, maybe not.
The cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis is a fringe theory suggesting that there have been geologically rapid shifts in the relative positions of the modern-day geographic locations of the poles and the axis of rotation of the Earth, creating calamities such as floods and tectonic events.[1][dead link]
Pole Shift: Predictions and Prophecies of the Ultimate Disaster - Kindle edition by John White. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Pole Shift: Predictions and Prophecies of the Ultimate Disaster.
There is evidence of precession and changes in axial tilt, but this change is on much longer time-scales and does not involve relative motion of the spin axis with respect to the planet. However, in what is known as true polar wander, the solid Earth can rotate with respect to a fixed spin axis. Research shows that during the last 200 million years a total true polar wander of some 30° has occurred, but that no super-rapid shifts in the Earth's pole were found during this period.[2] A characteristic rate of true polar wander is 1° or less per million years.[3] Between approximately 790 and 810 million years ago, when the supercontinentRodinia existed, two geologically rapid phases of true polar wander may have occurred. In each of these, the magnetic poles of the Earth shifted by approximately 55° – from a large shift in the crust.[4]
- 2Speculative history
Definition and clarification[edit]
The geographic poles are defined by the points on the surface of the Earth that are intersected by the axis of rotation. The pole shift hypothesis describes a change in location of these poles with respect to the underlying surface – a phenomenon distinct from the changes in axial orientation with respect to the plane of the ecliptic that are caused by precession and nutation, and is an amplified event of a true polar wander.
Pole shift hypotheses are not connected with plate tectonics, the well-accepted geological theory that the Earth's surface consists of solid plates which shift over a viscous, or semifluid asthenosphere; nor with continental drift, the corollary to plate tectonics which maintains that locations of the continents have moved slowly over the face of the Earth,[5] resulting in the gradual emerging and breakup of continents and oceans over hundreds of millions of years.[6]
Pole shift hypotheses are not the same as geomagnetic reversal, the periodic reversal of the Earth's magnetic field (effectively switching the north and south magnetic poles).
Speculative history[edit]
In popular literature, many conjectures have been suggested involving very rapid polar shift. A slow shift in the poles would display the most minor alterations and no destruction. A more dramatic view assumes more rapid changes, with dramatic alterations of geography and localized areas of destruction due to earthquakes and tsunamis.
Early proponents[edit]
An early mention of a shifting of the Earth's axis can be found in an 1872 article entitled 'Chronologie historique des Mexicains'[7] by Charles Étienne Brasseur de Bourbourg, a specialist in Mesoamerican codices who interpreted ancient Mexican myths as evidence for four periods of global cataclysms that had begun around 10,500 BCE.In 1889, Jules Verne imagined the possible consequences of artificial pole shift. In 1948, Hugh Auchincloss Brown, an electrical engineer, advanced a hypothesis of catastrophic pole shift. Brown also argued that accumulation of ice at the poles caused recurring tipping of the axis, identifying cycles of approximately seven millennia.[8][9]
In his controversial 1950 work Worlds in Collision, Immanuel Velikovsky postulated that the planet Venus emerged from Jupiter as a comet. During two proposed near approaches in about 1,450 BCE, he suggested that the direction of the Earth's rotation was changed radically, then reverted to its original direction on the next pass. This disruption supposedly caused earthquakes, tsunamis, and the parting of the Red Sea. Further, he said near misses by Mars between 776 and 687 BCE also caused the Earth's axis to change back and forth by ten degrees. Velikovsky cited historical records in support of his work, although his studies were generally ridiculed by the scientific community.[10]
John White Pole Shift Pdf Viewer Online
Charles Hapgood is now perhaps the best remembered early proponent. In his books The Earth's Shifting Crust (1958) (which includes a foreword by Albert Einstein)[11][12] and Path of the Pole (1970), Hapgood speculated that accumulated polar ice mass destabilizes the Earth's rotation, causing crustal displacement but not disturbing the Earth's axial orientation. Hapgood argued that shifts (of no more than 40 degrees) occurred about every 5,000 years, interrupting 20,000- to 30,000-year periods of polar stability. He cited recent North Pole locations in Hudson Bay (60°N, 73°W), the Atlantic Ocean between Iceland and Norway (72°N, 10°E) and the Yukon (63°N, 135°W).[13] However, in his subsequent work The Path of the Pole, Hapgood conceded Einstein's point that the weight of the polar ice is insufficient to cause polar shift. Instead, Hapgood argued that causative forces must be located below the surface.[14] Hapgood encouraged Canadian librarian Rand Flem-Ath to pursue scientific evidence backing Hapgood's claims. Flem-Ath published the results of this work in 1995 in When the Sky Fell co-written with his wife Rose.[15]
In 1974 Flavio Barbiero, an engineer and explorer, theorized that shifting of the Earth's axis took place 11,000 years ago and caused what was subsequently recorded in myth as the destruction of Atlantis and Mu. He suggested that shifting was probably caused by the impact of a comet on the Earth's surface and that the current position of Atlantis has to be sought under the Antarctic ice sheet.[16]
Recent conjectures[edit]
Several authors have offered pseudoscientific arguments for the hypothesis, including journalist and New Age enthusiast Ruth Shick Montgomery,[17] Richard W. Noone,[18] retired civil engineer James G. Bowles,[19] and 'William Hutton', reportedly the pseudonym of geologist Wyman Harrison.[20] Skeptics counter that these works combine speculation, the work of psychics, and modern folklore, while largely avoiding any effort at basic science by trying to disprove their own theory.[21][22][23]
Scientific research[edit]
While there are reputable studies showing that true polar wander has occurred at various times in the past, the rates are much smaller (1° per million years or slower) than predicted by the pole shift hypothesis (up to 1° per thousand years).[2][3][24] Analysis of the evidence does not lend credence to Hapgood's hypothesized rapid displacement of layers of the Earth.[25]Data indicates that the geographical poles have not deviated by more than about 5° over the last 130 million years, contradicting the hypothesis of a cataclysmic polar wander event.[26]More rapid past possible occurrences of true polar wander have been measured: from 790 to 810 million years ago, true polar wander of approximately 55° may have occurred twice.[4]
See also[edit]
Notes[edit]
- ^Kiger, Patrick J. Ends of the Earth: Shifting of the Poles. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2013-03-22. Retrieved 2009-11-22.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- ^ abBesse, Jean; Courtillot, Vincent (November 2002). 'Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr'. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 107 (B11): EPM 6–1. Bibcode:2002JGRB.107.2300B. doi:10.1029/2000JB000050.
- ^ abAndrews, J. A. (August 10, 1985). 'True polar wander - An analysis of cenozoic and mesozoic paleomagnetic poles'. Journal of Geophysical Research. 90 (B9): 7737–7750. Bibcode:1985JGR..90.7737A. doi:10.1029/JB090iB09p07737.
- ^ abMaloof, Adam C.; et al. (2006). 'Combined paleomagnetic, isotopic, and stratigraphic evidence for true polar wander from the Neoproterozoic Akademikerbreen Group, Svalbard, Norway'. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 118 (9): 1099–1124. Bibcode:2006GSAB.118.1099M. doi:10.1130/B25892.1.
- ^Scotese, C. R.'The PaleoMap Project'. Retrieved 2010-05-04.
- ^Cottrell, R. D.; Tarduno, J. A. (June 30, 2000). 'Late Cretaceous True Polar Wander: Not So Fast'. Science. 288 (5475): 2283. doi:10.1126/science.288.5475.2283a. PMID17769831.
- ^'Chronologie historique des Mexicains', L'Ethnographie (in French), Paris, France: Société d'Ethnographie, 7: 77–85, 1871, retrieved 2009-11-08
- ^Brown, Hugh Auchincloss (1967). Cataclysms of the Earth. Twayne Publishers.
- ^'Science: Can the Earth Capsize?'. Time. September 13, 1948. Retrieved 2009-11-08.
- ^Alexander, Robert E. (2005). Robert F. Morgan (ed.). The Velikovsky Affair: Case History of Iatrogenic Behavior in Physical Science. Morgan Foundation Publishers. pp. 21–24. ISBN1-885679-11-4.
- ^Charles H. Hapgood (1958). Earth's Shifting Crust: A Key to Some Basic Problems of Earth Science, introduction by Einstein. Pantheon Books. OCLC150491536. Archived from the original on 2013.
- ^Martinez-Frias, Jesus; Hochberg, David; Rull, Fernando (December 13, 2005). 'Contributions of Albert Einstein to Earth Sciences: A review in Commemoration of the World Year of Physics'. Naturwissenschaften. 93 (2): 66–71. arXiv:physics/0512114. Bibcode:2006NW...93..66M. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0076-8. PMID16453104.
- ^Olsen, Brad. 'Modern Esoteric: Beyond Our Senses', San Francisco, CCC Publishing, 2014). ISBN1888729503.
- ^Palmer, Trevor (2003). Perilous planet earth: catastrophes and catastrophism through the ages. Cambridge University Press. pp. 113–114. ISBN0-521-81928-8.
- ^Flem-Ath, Rand, Flem-Ath, Rose. When The Sky Fell: In Search of Atlantis (introduction by Colin Wilson, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1995). ISBN0-297-81628-4
- ^Barbiero, Flavio (2000). Una Civiltà Sotto Ghiaccio. Casa Editrice Nord, Realtà scientifiche. ISBN88-429-1168-2.
- ^Threshold to Tomorrow, (1984) ISBN978-0-449-20182-4ISBN0449201821; Strangers Among Us, (1979); Aliens Among Us, (1985) and The World to Come: The Guides' Long-Awaited Predictions for the Dawning Age, (1999).
- ^Noone, Richard W. (May 20, 1997). 5/5/2000, ICE: The Ultimate Disaster. New York City: Three Rivers Press. ISBN0-609-80067-1. Preface, Table of Contents, Appendices.
- ^Bowles, James (1999). 'Hapgood Revisited'. Atlantis Rising (18). Archived from the original on 2012-03-07. Retrieved 2009-11-09.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- ^'About The Hutton Commentaries'. Hutton Commentaries. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- ^'Magnetic Myths'. Skeptic. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- ^'Earth's magnetic field is not about to reverse and trigger global catastrophe'. Independent. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- ^Smit, Josephine (May 9, 2012). 'Will a Magnetic Pole Shift Mean the End of the World?'. Yale Scientific. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- ^Hoffman, P. (1999). 'The break-up of Rodinia, birth of Gondwana, true polar wander and the snowball Earth'. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 28 (1): 17–33. Bibcode:1999JAfES.28..17H. doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00018-4.
- ^Brass, Michael (July–August 2002). 'Tracing Graham Hancock's Shifting Cataclysm'. Skeptical Inquirer. 26 (4). Archived from the original on 2010-04-26. Retrieved 2010-04-19.
- ^Tarduno, John A.; Smirnova, Alexei V. (January 15, 2001). 'Stability of the Earth with respect to the spin axis for the last 130 million years'. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 184 (2): 549–553. Bibcode:2001E&PSL.184.549T. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00348-4.
External links[edit]
- Alleged 'Evidence' of Earth Crustal Displacement (Pole Shift) Analysis of specific evidence used to argue for geologically recent Pole Shift
- Fingerprints of the Gods (1995) by Graham Hancock, an analysis of arguments made for a Late Pleistocene Pole Shift, based on the ideas of Rand Flem-Ath by Heinrich, Paul V. 'The Wild Side of Geoarchaeology Page'. Archived from the original on 2011-05-25. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
- 'The Day the Earth Fell Over' at LiveScience
- Minds in Ablation Part Five Addendum: Living in Imaginary Worlds More about interpreting ancient maps and ideas of Charles Hapgood.
- A Corruption of European History - Buache's Map of 1739, About.com European History
- Mason, Betsy (30 August 2006). 'Earth's Poles May Have Wandered'. ScienceNOW. Archived from the original on 2013-01-17.
- “What is that pole shift thing?', Daily Common Sense blog